top of page

Chiropractic Care, Balance, and Coordination: Neurobiological Mechanisms, Sensorimotor Integration, and Nervous System Regulation

Balance and coordination are not simply products of muscle strength. They are emergent properties of continuous sensorimotor integration — the real-time fusion of proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual signals into coordinated motor output that stabilizes the center of mass, maintains head-trunk orientation, and guides every step we take. The nervous system achieves this through adaptive multisensory weighting and predictive internal models, particularly within cerebellar networks, that forecast the sensory consequences of movement and refine motor commands before errors even occur (Peterka, 2002; Horak, 2006; Wolpert et al., 1998). When any component of this integrated network is disrupted — whether through aging, injury, disease, or spinal dysfunction — the result can be dizziness, impaired postural control, unsteady gait, or an increased risk of falls. Chiropractic care addresses a specific and often overlooked contributor to these problems: vertebral column joint dysfunction. By restoring normal spinal motion and improving the quality of sensory signaling from the spine to the brain, chiropractic adjustments target the neurobiological foundations of balance and coordination at their source. This review examines the scientific evidence supporting that relationship — from the mechanoreceptors embedded in spinal joint capsules to the cortical and cerebellar processing centers that govern every coordinated movement the human body produces.

Image by Jeppe H. Jensen
Image by GMB Fitness
Image by Aaron Burden

Defining Balance, Coordination, and Proprioception

Precision in language matters when discussing the neurology of movement. Balance is best understood as comprising two distinct functional goals: postural orientation, which is the active alignment of the trunk and head relative to gravity and support surfaces, and postural equilibrium, which is the coordination of movement strategies that stabilize the center of mass during both static stance and dynamic tasks like walking or reaching (Horak, 2006). These are not passive reflexes but rather complex, learned sensorimotor skills that the brain refines throughout life. Coordination extends beyond balance to encompass the precise timing, sequencing, and multi-joint motor control required for tasks ranging from catching a ball to navigating a crowded sidewalk, and it includes reaction time, response time, and visuomotor integration.

​

Proprioception — the body's internal awareness of joint position, movement velocity, and muscular force — is the sensory foundation upon which both balance and coordination are built. The seminal review by Proske and Gandevia (2012) in Physiological Reviews established that proprioception arises from population-coded mechanosensory signaling across multiple receptor classes: muscle spindles that detect stretch and length changes, Golgi tendon organs that monitor force, joint capsule receptors that signal end-range positioning, and even cutaneous receptors in the skin that contribute to spatial awareness. These signals converge in the spinal cord and ascend through the dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway and spinocerebellar tracts to reach the cerebellum, brainstem, and somatosensory cortex, where they are integrated with vestibular and visual input to generate an accurate internal map of body position in space. When this proprioceptive signaling is degraded at its source — as can occur with vertebral joint dysfunction — the downstream consequences ripple through the entire sensorimotor system.

The Spine as a Sensory Organ: Mechanoreceptors, Muscle Spindles, and Afferent Signaling

The human spine is far more than a structural column. It is one of the most densely innervated regions of the musculoskeletal system, functioning as a critical sensory interface between the body and the central nervous system. Every vertebral joint capsule, ligament, disc annulus, and paraspinal muscle contains specialized nerve endings that continuously report information about spinal position, segmental motion, and mechanical loading to the brain. The classic Freeman-Wyke classification of articular mechanoreceptors, first described in 1967, identifies four distinct receptor types within joint tissues: Type I Ruffini endings, which are slowly adapting and respond to static joint position; Type II Pacinian corpuscles, which are rapidly adapting and signal dynamic acceleration and deceleration; Type III Golgi-like endings, which activate at end-range to provide ligamentous protection; and Type IV free nerve endings, which function as nociceptors signaling tissue damage or inflammation (Freeman & Wyke, 1967). This receptor diversity means that spinal joints do not merely sense whether they are moving — they encode the quality, velocity, direction, and limits of that movement in a continuous stream of afferent data transmitted to the central nervous system.

​

The cervical spine deserves particular attention in any discussion of balance and coordination because its proprioceptive contribution is disproportionately large relative to its size. Deep cervical muscles such as the suboccipital group, longus colli, and cervical multifidus contain an exceptionally high density of muscle spindles compared to limb muscles, reflecting their critical role in encoding head-on-trunk position and fine postural adjustments (Boyd-Clark et al., 2002). These spindles, modulated through alpha-gamma coactivation, serve as the primary engines of cervical proprioception and directly influence head position sense, gaze stabilization through cervico-ocular reflexes, and vestibular processing through dense neural connections between cervical afferents and the vestibular nuclei in the brainstem (Peng et al., 2021; Treleaven, 2008). Research consistently demonstrates that individuals with cervical dysfunction, including those with neck pain and whiplash-associated disorders, show measurably impaired joint position sense, altered cervicocephalic kinesthesia, and increased postural sway — all indicating degraded proprioceptive signaling from the cervical region to the brain (Peng et al., 2021).

​

Beyond the joints and muscles, connective tissue also contributes to the sensory landscape of the spine. A systematic review of fascial innervation by Suarez-Rodriguez et al. (2022) confirmed that fascia throughout the body, and particularly the thoracolumbar fascia, contains free nerve endings, Pacinian corpuscles, and Ruffini-like endings capable of mechanosensory and proprioceptive signaling. While receptor density and type vary by tissue region, these findings establish that the fascia surrounding the spine is not inert wrapping material — it is an active sensory tissue whose neural contributions should be considered alongside traditional joint and muscle receptor input when evaluating how spinal dysfunction affects the quality of afferent signaling to the brain.

The Cerebellum, Internal Models, and Predictive Motor Control

The cerebellum is the brain's coordination center, and understanding its function is essential to understanding how chiropractic care influences balance and motor control. Modern neuroscience has moved well beyond the view of the cerebellum as a simple timing device. The landmark review by Wolpert, Miall, and Kawato (1998) established that the cerebellum houses internal models — neural representations that predict the sensory consequences of motor commands before sensory feedback arrives. Forward models allow the brain to anticipate where a limb will be during rapid movement, while inverse models translate desired movement outcomes into the appropriate motor commands. These predictive mechanisms are what allow a basketball player to adjust a layup mid-flight or an older adult to catch their balance on an icy sidewalk. Critically, these internal models depend on accurate, high-fidelity proprioceptive input to remain calibrated. When the sensory information reaching the cerebellum is distorted — as when spinal joint dysfunction degrades afferent signal quality — the predictions generated by these internal models become less accurate, and movement coordination suffers.

​

One of the most compelling demonstrations of this principle comes from a 2018 study by Baarbé et al., published in PLoS ONE. Using a twin-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol to measure cerebellar inhibition of the primary motor cortex, the researchers found that individuals with subclinical recurrent neck pain failed to exhibit the normal reduction in cerebellar inhibition that occurs after motor skill acquisition — a neural signature of successful motor learning. Remarkably, following a single session of chiropractic spinal manipulation, this cerebellar-motor cortex plasticity was restored to normal patterns. This finding provides direct neurophysiological evidence that spinal dysfunction can impair cerebellar processing relevant to coordination and motor learning, and that chiropractic adjustments can normalize that processing. It also suggests a mechanism by which chronic spinal dysfunction could gradually degrade the accuracy of the brain's internal models, leading to progressively less efficient coordination, slower reaction times, and diminished balance over time.

Vertebral Subluxation: A Modern Neurophysiological Framework

Chiropractic has historically used the term subluxation to describe the clinical entity it seeks to identify and correct. In modern, evidence-informed chiropractic practice, the subluxation is best understood not as a bone simply out of place, but as a functional state of vertebral column joint dysfunction characterized by restricted intersegmental motion, altered joint play and end-feel, asymmetric paraspinal muscle tension, tenderness, and — most critically for this discussion — altered afferent signaling from the mechanoreceptors, muscle spindles, and connective tissue surrounding the dysfunctional segment. This contemporary definition aligns with the neurophysiological framework proposed by Haavik and Murphy (2012), who described spinal dysfunction as a state of disordered sensorimotor integration in which abnormal afferent input from the spine leads to maladaptive central processing, altered motor control, and compensatory neuromuscular patterns.

​

Within this framework, the chiropractic adjustment — a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust directed at a dysfunctional spinal segment — functions as a targeted, high-salience afferent perturbation. By rapidly restoring joint motion and mechanically stimulating the dense population of mechanoreceptors within the joint capsule and surrounding tissues, the adjustment generates a burst of novel sensory information that ascends to the spinal cord, brainstem, cerebellum, and cortex. This input can disrupt maladaptive sensorimotor loops, reduce aberrant nociceptive signaling from Type IV free nerve endings, and facilitate adaptive recalibration of the brain's internal models of body position and movement. The downstream consequences — improved proprioceptive accuracy, enhanced postural stability, more efficient muscle activation patterns, and better coordination — are precisely the outcomes documented in the clinical and experimental literature reviewed below.

How Chiropractic Adjustments Change the Brain: Evidence from Neurophysiology

The claim that chiropractic adjustments influence brain function is not theoretical — it is supported by a substantial body of experimental evidence using electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods. Foundational somatosensory evoked potential research by Haavik-Taylor and Murphy (2007) demonstrated that cervical spinal manipulation produces significant, measurable changes in cortical somatosensory processing. Specifically, the N20 and N30 components of the SEP waveform — markers of early somatosensory cortical activity and sensorimotor integration, respectively — decreased significantly following manipulation, with no changes observed at spinal or brainstem recording sites. This indicates that the adjustment's effects are not confined to the local spinal level but propagate to the cortex, altering how the brain processes sensory information from the body.

​

Building on this foundation, Lelic et al. (2016) used 62-channel EEG with brain source localization modeling to identify where in the cortex these changes originate. Their landmark study found that manipulation of dysfunctional spinal joints produced an approximately twenty percent reduction in prefrontal cortex N30 SEP amplitude. The prefrontal cortex is involved in executive function, motor planning, multisensory integration, and attentional resource allocation — functions directly relevant to complex coordination and balance in challenging environments. This finding suggests that spinal manipulation does not simply reduce pain or improve local mobility; it modulates higher-order brain processing in regions responsible for planning and executing coordinated movement.

​

Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have further elucidated the cortical mechanisms of chiropractic adjustments. Haavik et al. (2018) reported three novel findings following spinal manipulation: shortening of the cortical silent period, increased I-wave excitability at the single motor unit level, and increased low-threshold motoneuron excitability. The shortened cortical silent period indicates reduced intracortical inhibition — meaning the brain's motor output is less suppressed after an adjustment, allowing for more efficient neuromuscular drive. These changes in corticospinal excitability provide a plausible neurophysiological mechanism for the strength gains and improved voluntary activation documented in clinical studies. In a complementary line of research, Niazi et al. (2015) measured H-reflexes and V-waves before and after spinal manipulation and found a 44.97 percent increase in the V-wave to M-wave ratio — a direct indicator of increased cortical (supraspinal) drive to skeletal muscle — along with a 16 percent increase in maximum voluntary contraction force. These findings demonstrate that the strength and coordination improvements observed after chiropractic care are not merely biomechanical but originate from changes in how the brain drives the muscles.

Cervicogenic Dizziness: Where Spinal Dysfunction Meets Balance Impairment

One of the clearest clinical illustrations of the relationship between spinal function and balance is cervicogenic dizziness — a condition in which dysfunction of the cervical spine produces dizziness, unsteadiness, and impaired spatial orientation. This phenomenon is best understood through the lens of sensory mismatch theory: when proprioceptive signals from the cervical spine conflict with vestibular and visual information about head position and movement, the brain cannot generate a coherent spatial orientation map, and the subjective experience of dizziness results (Li et al., 2022; Treleaven, 2008). Because the cervical proprioceptive system has privileged reflex connections with the vestibular nuclei and oculomotor system, even relatively modest dysfunction of cervical joints or muscles can produce disproportionate effects on balance, gaze stability, and postural confidence.

​

Clinical research supports that chiropractic care can address this mechanism directly. A sham-controlled feasibility randomized controlled trial by Kendall et al. (2018) evaluated chiropractic treatment including instrument-assisted manipulation in community-dwelling older adults aged 65 to 85 with non-specific dizziness and neck pain. The chiropractic group demonstrated trends toward clinically meaningful improvements on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Neck Disability Index compared to sham controls. Similarly, a feasibility study by Strunk and Hawk (2009) reported a large effect size for balance improvement on the Berg Balance Scale following eight weeks of chiropractic care in adults presenting with dizziness and neck pain, with concurrent reductions in dizziness severity. These findings support a coherent physiological mechanism: by restoring normal cervical joint motion and reducing aberrant proprioceptive signaling from the neck, chiropractic adjustments can resolve the sensory mismatch that produces cervicogenic dizziness, leading to improved balance and postural confidence.

Clinical Evidence: Chiropractic's Impact on Balance and Falls Risk

The strongest clinical evidence for chiropractic's effect on balance comes from a landmark randomized controlled trial by Holt et al. (2016), published in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. This study evaluated 60 community-dwelling older adults over a twelve-week period and found that participants receiving chiropractic care demonstrated statistically significant improvements in multiple sensorimotor domains directly relevant to fall risk compared to a no-intervention control group. Specifically, the chiropractic group showed a 119-millisecond improvement in choice stepping reaction time — a measure of how quickly individuals can execute a corrective step when balance is unexpectedly challenged — along with improved ankle joint position sense and enhanced multisensory integration measured by the sound-induced flash illusion paradigm. Because stepping reaction time and ankle proprioception are among the strongest predictors of fall risk in older adults, these findings provide a direct mechanistic link between chiropractic care, improved sensorimotor processing, and reduced vulnerability to falls.

​

Further supporting the balance-chiropractic connection, a randomized controlled trial by Vining et al. (2020) evaluated 110 active-duty military personnel with low back pain and found that four weeks of chiropractic care produced statistically significant improvements in isometric pulling strength, trunk muscle endurance, and single-leg balance time with eyes closed compared to a wait-list control group. The balance finding is particularly notable: the chiropractic group improved their eyes-closed single-leg stance time while the control group showed no improvement, a difference that was statistically significant. These results demonstrate that improved spinal function enhances not only strength but also the proprioceptive and neuromuscular control required for static balance — even in young, physically fit individuals.

Coordination, Reaction Time, and Athletic Performance

Coordination depends on rapid sensory processing, efficient motor planning, and precise neuromuscular execution — and research suggests chiropractic adjustments may enhance each of these domains. Early investigation by Lauro and Mouch (1991) reported that athletes receiving chiropractic care demonstrated reaction times approximately eighteen percent faster than controls over a six-week period (Lauro & Mouch, 1991). A pilot study by Kelly, Murphy, and Backhouse (2000) found approximately 97-millisecond improvements in mental rotation reaction time following upper cervical adjustments, suggesting more efficient cortical processing. While these earlier studies have methodological limitations, more rigorous subsequent research has supported their general direction.

​

A randomized controlled trial by DeVocht et al. (2019) evaluated 120 elite Special Operations Forces military personnel — among the most physically trained individuals in the world — and found that participants receiving chiropractic manipulation demonstrated immediate improvements in whole-body response time on a complex movement-driven reaction test following a single session. This acute enhancement in neuromuscular responsiveness in asymptomatic, highly trained individuals is significant because it suggests that chiropractic adjustments can optimize nervous system function even in the absence of pain or obvious dysfunction. While sustained between-group differences were not significant over the two-week trial, the immediate effect supports the concept that restoring optimal joint mechanics and sensory input can reduce inhibitory interference and enable faster coordinated motor output. These findings are consistent with the widespread integration of chiropractic care into professional and Olympic sport, where chiropractors serve on the medical staffs of every NFL and NBA team and are utilized by elite athletes across virtually every competitive discipline.

Neurological Rehabilitation: Chiropractic and Stroke Recovery

Among the most compelling emerging applications of chiropractic care for coordination is neurological rehabilitation following stroke. Stroke disrupts motor cortical regions, producing deficits in balance, strength, and coordinated movement — often affecting one side of the body. A randomized controlled trial by Holt et al. (2021), published in Brain Sciences, evaluated whether adding chiropractic spinal adjustments to standard physical therapy rehabilitation could enhance motor recovery in chronic stroke patients compared to sham adjustments plus physical therapy. After four weeks, the chiropractic group demonstrated a 6.1-point greater improvement on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment — a validated measure of motor function — with particular gains in lower limb coordination and strength. Performance on the Timed Up and Go test also improved, reflecting more efficient transitions from sitting to standing and walking.

​

The mechanism underlying these improvements appears to be central rather than peripheral. The chiropractic interventions consisted of standard spinal adjustments targeting areas of vertebral subluxation — not the affected limbs or the site of cortical injury. This supports the neurophysiological model described throughout this review: by normalizing spinal afferent input, chiropractic adjustments improve the quality of sensory information ascending to the brain, facilitating more effective sensorimotor integration and enhancing the brain's capacity to reorganize motor control through neuroplasticity. Complementary research using TMS in chronic stroke patients has demonstrated that chiropractic spinal adjustments increase cortical drive to lower limb muscles (Holt et al., 2021 — Frontiers in Neurology), providing a direct neurophysiological correlate for the observed clinical improvements. These findings position chiropractic care not as a replacement for conventional rehabilitation but as a neurologically grounded adjunct that may augment recovery by optimizing the spinal sensory input upon which motor relearning depends.

Sensory Reweighting, Asymmetry, and the Global Compensation Model

The human postural control system does not rely on any single sensory channel. Instead, it dynamically reweights the relative contributions of proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual input depending on environmental demands — a process known as sensory reweighting (Peterka, 2002). When proprioceptive input from the spine and lower extremities is reliable, the nervous system weights it heavily for balance control. When that input becomes unreliable — as in spinal dysfunction, neuropathy, or aging — the system must compensate by increasing reliance on visual and vestibular channels, a strategy that is less efficient and more vulnerable to failure in challenging environments such as darkness, uneven terrain, or crowded spaces.

​

Structural asymmetries can amplify this problem. Systematic reviews demonstrate that leg length discrepancy produces measurable alterations in gait kinematics and postural stability, with compensatory strategies that create asymmetrical loading throughout the kinetic chain (Khamis & Carmeli, 2017). These compensations increase the motor control demand placed on the nervous system and may contribute to altered spinal loading patterns, asymmetric paraspinal muscle activation, and degraded proprioceptive fidelity. Chiropractic evaluation routinely includes assessment of such structural and functional asymmetries, and care is directed at reducing compensatory strain throughout the spine and pelvis — not as treatment for the asymmetry itself, but as a strategy for optimizing the quality of afferent input the nervous system receives from the musculoskeletal system.

Conclusion: The Spine-Brain Axis in Balance and Coordinated Movement

The ability to move confidently through the world — to walk without fear of falling, to react quickly to unexpected challenges, to perform with precision in sport and daily life — depends on precise, continuous communication between the spine and the brain. The vertebral column is not merely a structural support; it is a densely innervated sensory organ whose mechanoreceptors, muscle spindles, and connective tissue nerve endings provide the proprioceptive foundation upon which balance, coordination, and motor control are built. When vertebral joint dysfunction degrades the fidelity of this sensory input, the consequences cascade through the nervous system: distorted cerebellar internal models, impaired cortical sensorimotor integration, maladaptive muscle activation patterns, and ultimately, reduced balance and coordination.

​

Chiropractic spinal adjustments address this dysfunction at its neurobiological source. By restoring normal joint motion and generating high-salience afferent input to the central nervous system, adjustments have been shown to alter cortical processing in the somatosensory and prefrontal cortices, reduce intracortical inhibition, increase supraspinal motor drive, restore cerebellar-motor cortex plasticity, and produce measurable improvements in stepping reaction time, ankle proprioception, multisensory integration, muscle strength, and functional mobility across populations ranging from community-dwelling older adults to elite military operators to stroke survivors in neurological rehabilitation. These outcomes reflect a coherent, evidence-supported mechanism: optimized spinal function produces clearer sensory input, which enables more accurate brain processing, which generates more efficient motor output, which results in better balance, sharper coordination, and more confident movement.

​

For individuals seeking to reduce fall risk, recover from neurological injury, optimize athletic performance, or simply move through life with greater stability and confidence, chiropractic care offers a safe, holistic, and neurologically grounded approach to improving the body's most fundamental movement capabilities. The research reviewed here represents a growing body of evidence that continues to deepen our understanding of the spine-brain relationship and its profound implications for human health and performance.

References

  1. Baarbé JK, Yielder P, Haavik H, Holmes MWR, Murphy BA. "Subclinical recurrent neck pain and its treatment impacts motor training-induced plasticity of the cerebellum and motor cortex." PLoS ONE, 13(2):e0193413, 2018. PubMed | DOI

  2. Biller J, Sacco RL, Albuquerque FC, et al. "Cervical arterial dissections and association with cervical manipulative therapy: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." Stroke, 45(10):3155–3174, 2014. PubMed | DOI

  3. Boyd-Clark LC, Briggs CA, Galea MP. "Muscle spindle distribution, morphology, and density in longus colli and multifidus muscles of the cervical spine." Spine, 27(7):694–701, 2002. PubMed | DOI

  4. Cassidy JD, Boyle E, Côté P, et al. "Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case-control and case-crossover study." Spine, 33(4 Suppl):S176–S183, 2008. PubMed | DOI

  5. DeVocht JW, Vining R, Smith DL, et al. "Effect of chiropractic manipulative therapy on reaction time in special operations forces military personnel: a randomized controlled trial." Trials, 20(1):5, 2019. PubMed | DOI

  6. Freeman MAR, Wyke B. "The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat." Journal of Anatomy, 101(Pt 3):505–532, 1967. PubMed

  7. Haavik H, Murphy B. "The role of spinal manipulation in addressing disordered sensorimotor integration and altered motor control." Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 22(5):768–776, 2012. PubMed | DOI

  8. Haavik H, Niazi IK, Jochumsen M, et al. "Chiropractic spinal manipulation alters TMS induced I-wave excitability and shortens the cortical silent period." Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 42:24–35, 2018. PubMed | DOI

  9. Haavik-Taylor H, Murphy B. "Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study." Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(2):391–402, 2007. PubMed | DOI

  10. Holt KR, Haavik H, Lee ACL, Murphy B, Elley CR. "Effectiveness of Chiropractic Care to Improve Sensorimotor Function Associated With Falls Risk in Older People: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 39(4):267–278, 2016. PubMed | DOI

  11. Holt K, Niazi IK, Amjad I, et al. "The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Brain Sciences, 11(6):676, 2021. PubMed | DOI

  12. Horak FB. "Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?" Age and Ageing, 35(Suppl 2):ii7–ii11, 2006. PubMed | DOI

  13. Kelly DD, Murphy BA, Backhouse DP. "Use of a mental rotation reaction-time paradigm to measure the effects of upper cervical adjustments on cortical processing: a pilot study." Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 23(4):246–251, 2000. PubMed | DOI

  14. Kendall JC, French SD, Hartvigsen J, Azari MF. "Chiropractic treatment including instrument-assisted manipulation for non-specific dizziness and neck pain in community-dwelling older people: a feasibility randomised sham-controlled trial." Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 26:14, 2018. PubMed | DOI

  15. Khamis S, Carmeli E. "Relationship and significance of gait deviations associated with limb length discrepancy: A systematic review." Gait & Posture, 57:115–123, 2017. PubMed | DOI

  16. Kovanur Sampath K, Tumilty S, Wooten L, et al. "Effectiveness of spinal manipulation in influencing the autonomic nervous system — a systematic review and meta-analysis." Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 32(1):10–27, 2024. PubMed | DOI

  17. Lauro A, Mouch B. "Chiropractic Effects on Athletic Ability." Chiropractic: The Journal of Chiropractic Research and Clinical Investigation, 6(4):84–87, 1991. Abstract

  18. Lelic D, Niazi IK, Holt K, et al. "Manipulation of Dysfunctional Spinal Joints Affects Sensorimotor Integration in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Brain Source Localization Study." Neural Plasticity, 2016:3704964, 2016. PubMed | DOI

  19. Li Y, Yang L, Dai C, Peng B. "Proprioceptive Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Narrative Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment." Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(21):6293, 2022. PubMed | DOI

  20. Niazi IK, Türker KS, Flavel S, et al. "Changes in H-reflex and V-waves following spinal manipulation." Experimental Brain Research, 233(4):1165–1173, 2015. PubMed | DOI

  21. Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. "Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain—Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review." Pain and Therapy, 10(1):143–164, 2021. PubMed | DOI

  22. Peterka RJ. "Sensorimotor integration in human postural control." Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(3):1097–1118, 2002. PubMed | DOI

  23. Proske U, Gandevia SC. "The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force." Physiological Reviews, 92(4):1651–1697, 2012. PubMed | DOI

  24. Strunk RG, Hawk C. "Effects of chiropractic care on dizziness, neck pain, and balance: a single-group, preexperimental, feasibility study." Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 8(4):156–164, 2009. PubMed | DOI

  25. Suarez-Rodriguez V, Fede C, Pirri C, et al. "Fascial Innervation: A Systematic Review of the Literature." International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(10):5674, 2022. PubMed | DOI

  26. Treleaven J. "Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control." Manual Therapy, 13(1):2–11, 2008. PubMed | DOI

  27. Vining R, Long CR, Minkalis A, et al. "Effects of Chiropractic Care on Strength, Balance, and Endurance in Active-Duty U.S. Military Personnel with Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 26(7):592–601, 2020. PubMed | DOI

  28. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M. "Internal models in the cerebellum." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(9):338–347, 1998. PubMed | DOI

bottom of page